i grew up in small town america. as a kid, i worked in a dairy. my father and grandfather beth fought in world war ii. there were a lot of constants in my life. things i could rely on. church on sundays. the pledge of allegiance at school. the love and support of mom and dad. and the fact that i lived in the greatest country in the world where every daydreams come true. but last wednesday, as i sat in a congressional hearing room on a rainy day in washington, d.c., listening to whistle blowers' riveting accounts of what happened in benghazi on the

night chris stevens, ty woods and glenn dougherty were killed, my heart broke. hello and welcome to justice. i'm judge jeanine pirro. thanks for joining us tonight. i've spent my c'eira signing blame for wrongdoing, instructing jurors how to assess the truth, telling them to use their common sense in deciding who is credible, what has something to gain or lose. who has a motive to lie. telling them if someone lies once, you're free to assume they'll lie to you again. there is something about the truth when you hear it. simply know it. i'm on the night he died, chris stevens called whistle blower greg hicks to say we're under attack. the statement, clear, unequivocal and foreboding and hicks did everything he was supposed to. activating the emergency response plan, mobilizing a team to repel the attack, pulling the

state department's operation's center. continuously updating the center throughout the night, even chartering a plane to fly to tripoli response team to benghazi. at some point, hicks realized he was being left out of all decision-making and that the order had been given to stand down. there would be no rescue. we now know the obama administration lied to us. they misled us and they left americans to die. so what do we know? fact, the president knew at 5:00 p.m. his consulate and ambassador were under attack. he told dempsey and pin et a to take care of it. he simply went to bed. he didn't even bother to call. never checking with them again. fact. the next morning, the president takes air force one to fly to a las vegas fundraiser for himself while americans burn in the middle east. he can take care force one for a

campaign fundraiser, but he can't send fighter jets to save americans. fact. the fight lasted eight hours. fact. there was no spontaneous demonstration, no you-tube video that ignited the murderous fury in benghazi and they all knew it. it's not one fact, but each fact taken together as a connected whole that convinces us of what the truth is. and that truth, jay carney, susan rice, hillary clinton, barack obama, they all lied to us. now, i am tired of the sugarcoating. i'm tired of putting truth to the falsehood. a lie is a lie is a lie. let's call it what it is. the whistle blowers changed everything. the ones who were instructed by hillary's chief of staff, cheryl mills not to speak to anyone alone about benghazi, including

congressmen. greg hicks says it best. >> the job now is a significant -- it's a demotion. so i've been effectively demoted from deputy chief of mission to desk officer. >> mr. president, with all due respect, you actually demote the man who is on the phone all night scrambling to get help, destroying your classified records, chartering a plane, taking on the terrorists by himself. why? why would you do that? why would you demote a hero? and why would you lie to us? i'll tell you why. because of a looming presidential election seven weeks away. because americans can't be under attack, especially not a terrorist attack if, as you say, al qaeda is already on its heels. mr. president, how could you not send in reinforcements? how could you not send in americans trained for this very kind of emergency? you're the commander in chief.

that's your job. and enter hillary clinton. fact. because the benghazi consulate security was so substandard, it could only have been inhabited if you had issued the waiver. fact. your department continuously denied both ambassador stevens and deputy chief of mission hicks request for more security. fact. you actually reduced security when everyone knew of the threats and the prior assaults on benghazi and, please, don't even begin to try to sell us the idea that it was about saving money. because your own staffer, charlene lamb who supposedly was dismissed swore that the resources were not an issue and my sources tell me, lamb is now up for an even higher post in the state department. so hillary, why would you do this? >> i did tell the accountability

review board that secretary clinton wanted the post made permanent. >> oh, okay. now we know. you wanted to arrive on your chariot and announce the establishment of a permanent mission in a normalized libya. normalized? when you last visited libya, you had the defense department pre-position assets off the libyan coast in case you needed rescue. how could you? and then you swear under oath just back from weeks abroad, logging all those miles, recovering from the flu, the fall, the concussion and the blood clot, you testify you didn't know a thing about your friend the ambassador's request for more security. >> any of the requests, any of the cables having to do with security did not come to my attention. >> now hillary, i know you were busy that night.

calling the president of tunisia when all the action was in libya. but you can't deny requests for more security in benghazi and then blame the very people who asked for it. you can't have it both ways. and you want us to believe that you and the president are going to get the facts and get justice? you can't even get to the fbi to the crime scene for three weeks. and by the way, the fbi guys, they carry guns, don't they? if it takes them three weeks because it wasn't safe in benghazi, how the hell is it safe enough for you to keep our civilian diplomats there? and what to do? find some guys with impeccable reputations, beholden to your husband bill and ambassador named pickering, an admiral named mullen, have them investigate and make sure they don't ask you any questions. or talk to the guy in charge of

the emergency response and pickering, he's perfect. he apparentlyelieves america is already full of islam foebs. while you're at it, hillary, why not throw the president of libya under the bus, too. the man who traveled to benghazi at great personal risk confirming almost immediately what you already knew, that it was a terror attack and you basically call him a liar or clueless to the rest of the world. and how about your take on our money. you take it and buy an advertisement to apologize to the arab world about a video that has nothing to do with benghazi, while he burn us in effigy. that will keep the lie going too. "the new york times" says that our benghazi obsession is all about hysterical allegations of

crimes equal to watergate. really? my memory may not be all that great, but nobody died at watergate. and no one was left on the battlefield. our congress, though, they're good, they'll get to the truth. >> i find it truly disturbing and very unfortunate that when americans come under attack, the first thing some did in this country was attack americans. attack the military. attack the president. attack the state department. attack the former senator from the great state of new york, former secretary of state hillary clinton. >> you're kidding, right? >> we have the best military in the world. but even with all of the technological advances, they could not get there in time. >> now, this guy hasn't even heard the testimony and he's already accusing the man who has

the most to lose, his own life and who was actually on the ground and in the battle of lying. it gets worse. >> death is a part of life. >> what difference at this point does it make? >> it's as if they're saying enough with the dead and on with the living, on to my next election. and remember this one? >> the white house and state department have made clear that the single adjustment that was made to those talking points by either of these two institutions were changing the word consulate to diplomatic facility because consulate was inaccurate. >> today we know that was a boldfaced lie. there were 12 deletions of references to terrorism at the instruction of the white house and the state department. hillary's hench woman, that temple of veracity, victoria new land tells the cia to remove it

from the security warning because it could be used against hillary. but my favorite, leon panetta. there just wasn't enough time. listen to this one from seven months ago. >> monday morning quarterbacking going on here. basic principle is that you don't deploy forces into harm's way without knowing what's going on, without having some real time information. >> it wasn't enough time. how did you know the fight wouldn't last 24 or 48 hours or more? in which case you could have gotten rescuers there. you could have saved americans. but you didn't even start the process because you had no intention of saving those lives. you should be ashamed of yourself. yes, wednesday was a sad day for me personally. for the families of those killed and for any american who believes, as i do, that america is the citadel of honor and

freedom. this past week the dreams that i had as a little girl in that small town were shattered. with me now is a member of the house oversight and government reform committee pennsylvania congressman pat me hahn. >> good evening, judge. great to be with you. >> thanks for being here. you were there as i was on wednesday. what's your take on gregory hicks and his recounting of that night in benghazi? >> i thought the testimony was compelling. first because he gave us a firsthand view of what went on, on the ground and the same view that this administration apparently didn't feel important enough to ask themselves in the real time that they were doing the accountability review. so his testimony not only gave us a real sense of the intensity of the moment and what he was trying to do to protect those individuals who are out there in harm's way, but it also, of

course, opened the door to the whole litany of questions that you raised so eloquently in your opening statement here. >> you know, congressman, the whistle blowers, they had a lot to lose. why risk it? why do you think these guys took on washington? >> i think that they felt that they were out there on the point and left alone to begin with. you articulated a point that was of great concern to me that they put them in benghazi with a requirement that they inhabit a place that was not up to the standards that are required under the law. we've established that when we had our last, you know, institutions that were attacked. they also cut down the number much guards that were there for them to make sure that it was safe. it was recognized that this was a dangerous place. they put them in harm's way and i think they asked for more support. it wasn't given, and i think they were left on the point

alone. >> finally, congressman, did the white house lie to us? >> well, you know, i have great concerns when you say lie, i've got to be able to have the boldfaced assertion. but i'll tell you, we're certainly getting a lot in those e-mails that tell you that this is -- it is a flat-out misrepresentation of the facts on the ground and americans have to make their own decisions if that's what they think they get from the president and the institution, the department of state. if the credibility can be so fundamentally questioned by the very documents, the e-mails that contradict the information that they're putting forward. i think you would say, judge, before you, you'd question the witnesses. >> i would. congressman mee hahn thanks for being with us. >> thanks for having me. now to our poll question. who do you think is most responsible for the failure to send help to americans in

benghazi. facebook or tweet me at judge jeanine. we'll read some of your answers later in the show. coming up, we told you that american lives could have been saved in benghazi. since then, chairman of the joint chiefs of staffs, dempsey, leon panetta and thomas pickering said it couldn't be done. were they lying?

we told you months ago that the administration lied and americans died. this week explosive testimony finally blows the whistle on those denials to send help. with me is fox news military analyst, colonel david hunt who joins us from boston and former navy seal christopher who was friends and a seal with ty woods and glenn dougherty. colonel hunt, i'll go to you first. i'm going to assume that the fight began at 9:30 at night in benghazi and lasted eight hours.

i want you it assume the official washington response was the assets can't get there in time. what's your reaction to that claim? >> it's preposterous, it's a lie and we had forces within two hours by jet and three hours by air that were in croatia, armed and ready to go. >> how far is croatia from benghazi? how long would that take? >> it would take about three hours. this is a force from instite garth called charlie 110. they were armed and ready to respond to this kind of crisis. >> who was in stut guard germany? >> there was a squadron from delta force en route and there. they were a little bit farther away by four hours by air. but they're available. >> can you tell us, colonel, before i go to chris here, can you tell us what is the purpose of delta force? what is it made up of and what is a c-1-10 group?

what's that about. >> it's the inex trem is force designed for special forces out of germany. designed to fill the gap. from the time it sakes seal team 6 to fly from the east coast to europe. they were designed ready to do what happened in benghazi. they needed the order to go. delta force is the army's seal team 6. >> all right. chris, i'm going to ask you about delta force. it's your version of the seal team. >> absolutely. >> you were a seal. how long would it take a seal team, assuming they're somewhere around here to get together and get to benghazi. >> when seals are in a combat theater, which anywhere would be in this area, we're on a very short lease. we can't be within more than 30 to 60 minutes away from our gear and bags and weapons ready to go. if we got the call to go, we would be on a plane within n an

hour flying there. two-hour fly time, we're on scene in less than three hours. >> you were stationed -- >> i've been in sicily. in germany, afterian owe air base, in croatia. all those places. >> what's the frustration level that there were no seal teams, no one was ordered to respond? >> the frustration level is very high. there were guys in the area, all over the place. >> you know this for a fact? >> i know this for a fact. there was a 15 in tripoli that could have been there within 2.5 hours. >> they got the order to stand down. >> colonel, chris, stand by. they kept ripping away the truth 12 times to get to a lie. how long now to the truth?

you all remember susan rice

appearing on those five sunday talk shows pushing the violent protests over the despicable you-tube video lie. we now know the white house and state department lied to us about the truth, also to the press. mistake. with me now is former cia operative mike baker. joins us from boise. david hunt still with us from boston and christopher is still with us in new york. mike, right from the get-go, they threw the cia under the bus. do you feel exonerated? >> yeah. unhappily so. you'd like to think that the white house has more honor than that. we've been talking about, judge, on your show surely since the attack occurred. the white house, oddly enough, is in charge of the white house talking points, the points that they put together under their direction to explain their position on any particular matter. they would like us to think somehow that the cia is driving that train or the state

department now. as if somehow the white house is nothing more than a mouthpiece. you send over your talking points, we'll read whatever you draft. it's an indication of this continuing contempt that the president has for the public and the belief that they can't tell the difference between a load of crap and the truth. >> that's an interesting comment. colonel hunt, i'm going back to you. one of the things that greg hicks said was that he was told that they couldn't get an f-16 there because they didn't have an air tanker to refuel. what's your thought on that? >> it's ridiculous on the face of it. f-16 takes off, it's super sonic. from aviano it leaves and they refuel in sicily and then into benghazi and the same thing coming back. we've been in combat over 11 years. this administration over four years. we know how to go from point a to point b and kill something. they were never given the order to do it. >> colonel, why didn't they get that order to defend americans? why? >> the only answer is political. again, the military is so

well-trained. along with the intelligence service, after this much combat, it's a political -- i don't know why the president didn't get the order. i just know he is the only one that can do it. >> martin dempsey, you know him, you worked with him. why would he say we couldn't have gotten there in time? >> it's disingenuous at best and a lie at the worst. i serve with marty as colonel. shows you how good my career was. marty knows better and everyone in special operations community and the air force who is in europe at that time know better. >> okay. and mark, you lost two friends. the seal community. i mean, this is what you guys do. what is the feeling in that community? >> there's a big feeling of frustration. this is what we train for and live for. there were half a dozen or more hardcore government assets that could have been on scene within four hours. nobody, nobody got the call i said it before. i'll say it again.

they let my buddies hang out on that rooftop, exposed without any support ridiculous. >> why do you think they did that? >> as the colonel said, there's got to be a political agenda at work here. what they're covering up, we're not sure yet. but it will come out at some point in time. this administration reeks. >> mike baker, what about you, i mean, the cia community, i mean, what is their take on all of this after you hear from hicks and the whistle blowers who had so much on the line and willing to take it? >> right. well, there's a lot of people right now that are very thankful for this week and what took place. as you pointed out, also for a growing realization for the press corps, they've been lied to from the start. that more than anything will continue this push and give us more traction. the agency, they've got a long history of getting thrown under the bus. that part they're used to. to show that they were very clear in their reporting, leading up to this attack, talking about the deteriorating security situation and all the problems taking place, all of

those difficulties, then to have those pulled out over a period of 12 different revisions and have the white house now try to pass off this idea that, well, you know, it was just the agency and the state department. we had nothing do with it. they're driving the train. >> it is disappointing. colonel hunt, very quickly. i mean, you know, what about all of the forces that were trained to get involved in this and emergencies. i mean, some of them actually disobeyed orders and left from tripoli and went to benghazi in spite of what the president didn't order. your take on that? >> yeah. they did from tripoli. we have to remember, if it wasn't for the cia at the base, more americans would have died. fought their way down and a mile back to save americans. they did it on their own. it was a small, very, very good force. but the issue is we had other forces that also could have been there. when this fight starts, nobody knows, as you said, it was going to last eight hours.

it could have lasted 24. no excuse. >> all right, colonel hunt, mike and chris, thanks for being with us. coming up, three women missing for a decade escape a house of horrors. shocking details. did the police fail to follow clues? plus, convicted murderer jodi arias, should she live or die? i'm going to give you my thoughts on her sentence later on.

now we'll get you back to justice with judge jeanine. four hostages freed after years of isolation, rape and abuse at the hands of a kidnapper. ariel castro. amanda berry a escaped the house of horrors with her 6-year-old daughter. ultimately freeing her fellow captives. with the latest fox news reporter garrett ten ee from cleveland. >> good evening.

>> good evening, judge. the big question here in cleveland tonight is where is michelle knight. amanda berry and gina dejesus are back at home with their families. the third victim, michelle knight wants nothing to do with her own family. i spoke to her grandmother yesterday and she says not only has the family not seen michelle since she was rescued five days ago, they haven't spoken to her. we spoke to the fbi and told us michelle is doing well. she is surrounded by people who care about her and that it's her decision of whether or not she ever wants to make contact with her family. the mom -- the manno owe. >> go ahead. >> judge? >> well. >> the men who held the women captive -- >> all right. but i guess my question is why would you not want to talk to her family? >> you know, judge, that's the big question that everyone is asking. why wouldn't someone want to see their family after 11 years in captivity? she was held captive longer than any of the other two girls.

we've heard various reports of family situations that they have that would make her not want to go back. we know that before she was kidnapped, she had a child and that child was taken away by the state over a child custody case. other than that, family is not really talking, michelle is not talking. fbi and police aren't talking as well. it's another one of the unanswered questions we have in the situation. >> do we know whether or not the women are talking to each other, the three women who were held captive? >> when we spoke with the fbi, they told us that as soon as the three women were out of there and they were back with the police, that they were asking about each other. how is gina? how is michelle? how is amanda? asking where they were. big hugs were taking place there as they were at the police station, and as they left to be reunited with their families again. there's a certain camaraderie there as you can imagine after ten years in captivity. >> garrett, thanks for being

with us this evening. >> certainly, judge. all right, with me now, former lapd homicide detective and fox news contributor mark if you remember man and former prosecutor dan sure here with me in new york city. mark, apparently there were numerous reports from neighbors that they called about women that they say were on dog leashes in the backyard. at least one incident of a woman pounding on the window in the castro house. police say they never received these calls. did the cops drop the ball here? >> i don't believe so, judge. when you look at the neighborhood, it's kind of a rough neighborhood. i'm not saying that from personal experience. i talked to rod wheeler, who works for fox. he was a homicide detective in d.c., grew up in this neighborhood. he says, you're exactly right. it's a rough neighborhood and people sometimes, when they do call the police, they don't leave their name, they don't leave their address. hard to follow-up if you don't see the conduct that they called. did they call 911?

was it recorded? did they call the local police station? did they even call at all? i think that there's -- >> i think it's interesting, mark, that you say it's a rough neighborhood. isn't that a place where you might suspect that there would be more crime and that, in these particular neighborhoods in particular, you have to make sure that you follow-up. because people don't talk and to get a call from a neighborhood like this is highly unusual. by the way, isn't cleveland where that serial murderer anthony sole was murdering women and the stink was so high, they thought it was a sausage factory. it was the bodies deteriorating? cleveland p.d. couldn't figure that one out either. >> well, come on, your honor, when it's a rough neighborhood, when it's a rough neighborhood, you have more calls to service and more calls to service, drug dealing, shooting, fights, knife fights, ba beatings, domestic violence. when you see somebody walking around -- >> mark, come on.

>> they didn't report -- your honor, don't act like russia called and said they've got a kidnapped rapist living on seymour street. he wasn't on probation or parole. he was not on the radar and he actually -- >> his place to find out why he left that kid on the bus. i would have charged him with endangering a child. on to dan sure. they say there's a possibility of charging him with a capital crime for beating the woman who carried the baby. >> right. >> five times. do they actually need evidence of a fetus or some dna indicating that fetuses were somewhere buried? the area? >> they don't. obviously, that would be help fum. but the statute is ago aggravated murder. it qualifies for a capital murder in the course of a kidnapping or with prior calculation. her word about what happened, happened multiple times with the other victims' testimonies and aum the other evidence showing kidnapping, abuse, that should

be enough to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. >> all right. the d.a. is saying i'm going to charge every crime, every rape, every this, every that. you and i both know you can't possibly do that. pick five or six, nail them. you'll get enough to keep this guy in jail the rest of his life if not death. >> they're talking about a separate charge of kidnapping for every day of kd napping. >> it's not necessary or legally allowable. every day is a separate kidnapping? >> if necessity say it's a different restraint, taken out of chains and put back in chains. you can argue that's a separate restraint. i i agree with you. possibly get the death penalty through the aggravated murder statute. >> if in case goes to trial, the women will have to testify. do you believe that these women are capable of testifying given what they've been through? >> i don't -- certainly i don't have any personal knowledge of this. but i think, considering what i've seen, i think that they're

going to step up and do what they have to do. i don't think that they're going to back away and refuse to testify. i think this would be a perfect opportunity to videotape a testimony or have the defendant in another room viewing the proceedings. i don't think it would be proper to have them in the same room as this man. >> well, it's certainly, i'm sure that a judge would make some kind of, you know, appropriate setting for these women to testify. you know, dan, the mother here is the one who reached out and got that guy, charles ramsey, who i think is a hoot. >> amanda berry. >> the one who reached out. do you think her being the mother of a 6-year-old what got her to make that final step? >> it's possible. we don't know yet what drove her to get help at the time. what made her think this was okay. she could scream and get help and risk the wrath of her prisoner. maybe it was because she had a 6-year-old kid who was starting to grow up and didn't want her

growing up in that environment. >> obviously, he was a pedophile. he grabbed these girls when they were very young and this 6-year-old, i think, was probably someone he had in his sights, don't you think? >> i think so. i think these women -- these women, then girls, are getting older. and i think that he probably tried to kidnap women before this until he honed his m.o. and i think he would have, quite possibly, tried to get rid of these women and replace them or replace the basement with more women. >> all right. mark and dan, thanks very much and i got to tell you, this guy is not going to survive in prison very long. i don't think they'll have to worry about him much longer. up next, now that the ordeal is over, can the three women and a 6-year-old move on with their lives or will they forever be haunted by this nightmare? now that she's convicted, don't miss my take on what miss jodi arias' fate should be.

the boys used double miles from their capital one venture card to fly home for the big family reunion. you must be garth's father? hello. mother. mother! traveling is easy with the venture card because you can fly airline anytime. two words. double miles! this guy can act. wanna play dodge rock? oh, you guys! and with double miles you can actuay use, you never miss the fun. beard growing conte and go! ♪ win! what's in your wallet?

you need police, fire or ambulance? >> i need police. >> what's going on there? >> i've been kidnapped and i've been missing for ten years. i'm here, i'm free now. >> so sad. the nightmare is finally over for the three young cleveland victims and a little girl.

but after experiencing such depravity for so long, is it even possible for them to recover and successfully return to society? let's ask clinical psychologis , joining us from philadelphia. thanks for being here. >> sure. >> how do these women begin to recover? >> well, i think that they likely will all have a difficult recovery. but given the strength that they showed in enduring this horrendous abduction and treatment in that house, i think they are likely to recover quite well given that they have support from their families and that they get the necessary treatment. >> now, you know, doctor, we've heard that michelle knight refused to talk to her family or be with her family. it doesn't seem that she has the support like the other two women. how do you think that's going to impact her? >> well, she in fact may have a

more difficult recovery. there are some reports that her childhood was more difficult than the childhood of the other two women. and that does place her at greater risk of having more emotional difficulties during this recovery period. >> doctor, what about post-traumatic stress syndrome and the disorder? you know, these women, i imagine -- i've dealt with so many victims myself. i mean, how long does it go on? you know, do you ever free yourself of the nightmare? >> right. well, they are all likely to have some acute post-traumatic stress reaction. in fact, i heard a report that one of the girls was uncomfortable or fearful of going to sleep alone in her family's home. that is very normal, natural reaction given the terrible trauma that they endured. but with time, she is likely to overcome those post-traumatic stress symptoms that caused her

to generalize whatever fears she developed in that household to her own family home. i think with the proper therapy, she will be able to overcome that. >> doctor, what is the proper therapy? >> well, there are some very well-researched therapy approaches for post-traumatic stress disorder, both for children and for adults. probably the most research, well-documented therapies fall in the category of trauma focused behavioral therapy. >> which means? >> they essentially help children and adults to face the traumas that they've suffered. to talk about them clearly, to even write about them. and then ultimately, share this experience with a supportive adult. >> doctor, one of the things that i've always believed in and especially with child sexual assault cases, was that it was

cathartic, it was therapeutic to confront their abuser and to have a jury believe them. now, you understand that in the criminal justice system, these women will have to take the stand unless the plea bargain is offered. what do you think? >> well, i think all of these women have shown incredible strength and incompetent think they will be capable of doing that. and as you said, in some instances, it can be very healing. >> all right. doctor, finally, do the women need each other to heal as they go forward? >> yes. yes. it appears that they have created a bond among all four of them actually, including the little girl. i think that could be very valuable going forward. that they maintain that bond, that they connect with one another. there's no one on this earth that suffered exactly what they each suffered. so it is something that they've shared that might be valuable for them to continue to connect with one another. >> doctor, thanks so much for being with us this evening.

>> of course. coming up, i don't think there's ever been a more deserving creep of the week than jodi arias. you're not going to want to miss what i have to say about this woman. and your last chance to vote in our poll. who do you think is most responsible for failure to send help to americans in benghazi? tweet me at judge jeanine or facebook me. we'll read your answers after the break.

now our creep of the week. now that it's finally over, jodi arias, my perfect creep of the week. without a doubt, one of the most difficult decisions i faced as d.a. was whether to seek the death penalty. it's one decision that d.a.'s,

judges and jurors agonize over. she shot, stabbed, brutalized and virtually decapitated him. she lied, denied and pointed the finger at others. and when that didn't work, she trashed the memory of a kind, loving, decent human being who was unable to defend himself because she put him six feet under. she sold her body like a prostitute to lure him to his death. not a quick death. instead, a long, painful ordeal, incapacitated as he watched her continually stab him as he bled out. of course she deserves death. all the aggravating factors are there. she's truly a dangerous individual who should not roam freely among us. but i have an idea. death is too good for her. this wannabe celebrity, songstress, artist and television star needs to age in jail and watch the world go by to iron bars. she needs to experience the

graying of her long brown tress, the wrinkling of her smooth, ivory complexion, the cellulite in those firm thighs that she trapped her victim in. the sagging of the skin above her knees. no. death is too good for her. she needs to rot in jail before she rots in her deserved place in hell. and here are the results of tonight's insta-poll. we asked you who do you think is most responsible for failure to send americans in benghazi? we had more than 2,000 responses. the majority of you saying president obama is to blame. closely followed by hillary. and now to your tweets. sa bin a says i believe obama and hillary knew, that makes them equally responsible. and biden shares the blame. mary says our commander in chief is ultimately responsible. he should have stopped partying in vegas and did his job and sherry says panetta because he didn't have the valor to stand up to the stand down. before i say good night, i want to wish all the moms, especially my mom, a very happy mother's

day. that's my mom and me and my baby ki ki. that's it for us tonight. thanks for joining us and remember to

we got adt because i walked in on a burglary once. the physical damage was pretty bad. the emotional toll was even worse. our daughter had nightmares. what that robber really took from us was our peace of mind. with adt, we got it back. [ male announcer ] every 14.6 seconds, a burglary takes place in the united states. so rely on the fast alarm response of adt. a single adt system can help protect you from burglary, fire, and high levels of carbon monoxide. when an alarm is received, adt calls the local authorities for help. and you can get this monitored protection, plus great local service, starting at just over $1 a day. and only adt offers a theft protection guarantee. take it from me. the time to think about a security system isn't after something bad happens -- it's before. [ male announcer ] call now and get one of our best values --

adt's quick connect plus system installed for $99. hurry, and take advantage of these savings. adt. always there. we'll have huckabee starting now. . tonight on huckabee. orders to stand down on a rescue mission. nthey were furious and proof that the talking points were changed. has the truth on benghazi comes to light, the governor asked. >> what difference does it make? it matters to the friends and family? mast master -- shawn smith's mother on why she blames the former